Government of the people, for the people, by the people, these are the immortal
words of Abraham Lincon. What the NAMA legislation represents is Government
of the developers, for the banks, by Fianna Fail and the Greens. It gives me no pleasure whatsoever to speak on this legislation. The country as a whole has been
devalued by the despicable behaviour of a few. While it’s easy to accuse the developers of the greater part of this debacle, in my view, it was the bankers.
There were a number of telling signs that we had gone off track as a nation. The main banks, AIB and Bank of Ireland both sold their headquarters to pension funds when the market was at its maximum. When the people who provide the funding sell their most valuable asset alarm bells should be going off all over the place. Unfortunately
while the alarm bells were going off and our well paid public and civil servants in the higher echelons of regulation chose the only path open to them,which was to do nothing.
You might ask how I’ve come to that conclusion. But consider the position of Mr. Patrick Neary, Financial Regulator. How could this supposed independent regulator cry halt when every government minister, our current Taoiseach included, and the previous Taoiseach, were saying ‘party on lads, our economy is built on sound foundations.’ How could this supposed independent regulator,who is appointed by Government, come out and say everything that the people were pointing are currently saying, is wrong. One has to only remember former Taoiseach Ahern’s comment about ‘independent objective economists’ who he believed to be talking down the economy, they should consider committing suicide. Our one party state Fianna Fail in Government for 23 of the lat 25 years has led us to this. God forbid independent regulators should have acted independently. This would have been too much to ask.
Where were the Governers of the Irish Central Bank? Now that the European Central Bank are in place it did not mean that they absolved themselves of all further duties.
But absolve themselves they did. We as a nation are now paying the price.
The Minister has said he will accept amendments at committee stage to the legislation. The valuation has received a lot of coverage, however the types of assets has not. In my view, we have the good, the bad and the ugly. The ugly assets have animals grazing on them and are likely to have stock walking across them for many years to come. I am of the view that there must be a buy-back clause in relation to these assets. The banks would love to transfer these to NAMA at the supposed valuations of what they were purchased for. NAMA will never achieve this in its lifetime, or a fraction of this. The clause will then force the valuers for the banks to place a realistic figure that might be achieved in time. If this does not come to pass the banks must re-purchase the assets at the price they were transferred to NAMA for in the first place. The taxpayers of today and the future will be protected and not forced to take the most deplorable hit on the poorest of assets purchased by developers in the Celtic Tiger era.
The Government believes this is a ‘Ronseal’ deal – it does what it says on the tin.
My concern is yes, if we value these assets high enough, it will give the banks the
opportunity to cash the Government bonds with the European Central Bank. This
for all intents and purposes is the European Central Bank’s way of injecting capital
into the Irish economy. We thank them for that but with no guarantee from our friends in the lending institutions that the funds in question will be put into the home market to ensure jobs are protected and made. There is a huge number of jobs teetering on the brink of extinction because of cash flow difficulties. To date the banks have not met to facilitate business by providing funds to protect sustainable businesses of the past and potential future due to cash flow problems. The banks can place these funds from the ECB into their balance sheets to provide the correct ratio between funds lent and funds on deposit that they now require to meet. The doomsday scenario is even after all these funds from NAMA, the State will be required to further recapitalise and nationalise.
These are the very same lending institutions who facilitated the transfer of funds out of the country illegally and the establishment of many offshore accounts. The banks set up dozens of accounts per client and in some cases with false names to mask their clients and their fraudulent actions. Those who were caught and were pursued by the Revenue Commissioners paid the relevant tax, interest and penalties that were due. The banks paid their fines and continued with business as usual. How can we trust these people when their actions and deeds have been so dishonourable towards the State. Lending institutions have a commitment towards shareholders with no public interest remit. However when they face ruin due to their reckless trading they ask the State to intervene and save their industry.
Astonishingly our six small institutions internationally are placing their corporate identity ahead of everything else. Remember Mr. Fingleton’s son, at Irish Nationwide. Remember the belligerance towards the Minister for Finance when the idea was floated about a merger of some of the above institutions. The corporate identity is much more important than safeguarding taxpayers money. The Minister for Finance must ensure that the observation of NAMA is open, transparent, and unquestioned by all. Why? Without this the public will not believe the one party Fianna Fail state will not favour those who have funded them throughout the Celtic Tiger boom.
The Minister for Finance must ensure that the taxpayers are not compromised by developers whose loans have been transferred to NAMA but their liability is still the same with the State. This can be no developers’ charter for them to renege, file for receivership or go into examinership, only to re-appear some period of time later and continue trading like nothing has happened. These are the same people who helicoptered, jetted, and lived like mercantile princes of the 1800s. The taxpayers of our country will not accept funding NAMA to allow developers re-establish business as usual. There are concerns many developers have placed properties with no mortgages into family members names. While at a corporate level their companies may be bankrupt, but these people still have a huge asset value out of reach and in effect being paid for by our citizens. This is not acceptable. The personal guarantees are a minefield legally and may not be worth the paper they are written upon. I have no doubt there will be many legal challenges before a clear corridor is available for officials within NAMA.
The same civil servants in our one party state who chose not to tell the Emperor he has no clothes will be the same people attempting to force the banks to provide capital to business who failed us at the peak of the boom. Have the State employees sufficient financial, legal and administrative abilities to compete with the hired guns, the major banks and major developers are likely to draft in. I don’t believe they have.
The real difficulty with NAMA is our ability to provide funds for people within our State who need the service of our State. The measure of any society is how well we look after those who are less capable of looking after themselves. With all our capacity removed the cuts, savings, adjustments, whatever the Government deputies wish to call this, is gone. All our abilities for additional funds will be consumed by NAMA. Banks to be looked after before the citizens.
I want to demonstrate what a million is and what a billion is. If we count one million seconds and transfer it into days it amounts to about 12 days. If we count one billion seconds it amounts to 32 years.